|
Campaigns
|
|
Physical Agents (Noise) Directive
Page 4 of 5
European Arts and Entertainment Alliance (EAEA)
Joint letter sent to Members of Parliament and Members of the Council of Ministers:-
EAEA POSITION ON THE DIRECTIVE REGARDING THE EXPOSURE OF WORKERS TO RISKS ARISING FROM PHYSICAL AGENTS (NOISE)
European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for
adopting a European Parliament and Council Directive on the minimum health and
safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to risks arising from physical
agents (Noise) (seventeenth specific Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1)
of Directive 89/391/CEE) (10479/1/2001 - C5-0546/2001 - 1992/0449 A (COD))
Paris, April 3, 2002
Ladies and Gentlemen Members of Parliament and Members of the Council of Ministers,
In order to provide you with certain elements which might be of assistance to you
during the examination which you will be carrying out within the Conciliation Committee,
the European Arts and Entertainment Alliance (EAEA) made up by the International
Federation of Musicians (FIM), the International Federation of Actors (FIA) and Media
and Entertainment International (UNI-MEI), would like to forward to you the following
position.
EAEA represents several hundred thousand performing arts' workers in Europe. Our member
unions represent musicians, singers, actors, dancers and technicians who help this
sector express its creative and cultural potential.
At this stage, our comments will only have bearing on amendment no. 23 adopted by the
European Parliament on second reading on March 13, 2002.
We should like to remind you that EAEA and the Performing Arts Employers Association
League Europe (PEARLE) who sit together in the European Social Dialogue Committee for
the Performing Arts instituted by the European Commission, had forwarded the following
proposed amendment to the European Parliament for its second reading:
"Member States recognise that the live performing arts sector requires a regulation
that shall be better adapted to its specificities. Consequently, specific rules shall
be worked out with the preliminary consultation of the social partners in order to
guarantee the effective health protection of these professionals without being detrimental
to the interests of the artistic activity and to the development of employment in the
sector".
The reason behind this amendment was based on pragmatism and efficiency, and the will to
bring about a real protection for the performing arts sector workers. The proposal had
number of advantages, namely to:
promote the specific needs of the sector whilst respecting the prime concern
of the Directive's initiators, i.e. that of ensuring the efficient protection of
workers' health;
foster a sectorial collective bargaining at Community level, in accordance
with the objectives set by article 6 of the European Social Charter (an objective
which the European Commission strives to promote by setting up Sectorial European
Social Dialogue Committees) to make sure that any improvement in the protection of
workers' health does not place such sectors in difficulty;
In the enclosed letter which was sent to the Members of the European Parliament, we put
forward further elements justifying our request to adopt protecting measures specific to
the music and entertainment sectors, in order not to jeopardize the employment but also
to promote more efficient systems of health protection.
Unfortunately, amendment no. 23 adopted by the Parliament does not exactly correspond to
the concerns that were voiced by us. It contains a genuine danger which we firmly wish
to oppose, as it might lead to denying any right to an efficient protection of music and
entertainment workers against the excessive exposure to noise. Moreover, this amendment
would also go against the spirit expressed in our former position.
The amendment states that within a period of five years from its coming into force, the
Directive will not be applicable to the music and entertainment sectors. During the first
two years, the Commission is to draft a report in collaboration with the social partners,
aiming to analyze the implications of the Directive for the music and the entertainment
sectors. On the basis of this report, the Commission shall submit a proposal to the Council
calling either for these activities to be regulated by appropriate measures or for music
and the performing arts to be excluded from the Directive's field of application.
Should no proposal be issued by the Commission, the Directive shall be applied to those
sectors five years after its coming into force.
As an umbrella trade union organization representing music and entertainment workers, we
should like to make the following comment and recommend an improvement of the Parliament's
first amendment.
Comment
We feel that the spirit of this amendment takes into account the specific nature of the
music and entertainment sectors as well as the crucial role of sound and noise therein.
We entirely agree to more in-depth investigations being carried out in cooperation with
the social partners, as only this will give the Parliament and the Council the means to
mature a more accurate opinion regarding the protection of those workers that we represent
against noise. Such a provision would also strongly foster the European Social Dialogue
on Live Performance, run under the auspices of the European Commission's DG for Employment
and Social Affairs.
In no way, however, have EAEA and PEARLE ever suggested that the music and entertainment
sectors should be excluded from the field of application of the Directive. Any such exclusion
would be in complete contradiction with the spirit of the Directive and, what is more,
totally unacceptable.
It would entail a total lack of protection for professional activities characterized by
numerous and serious health risks. Furthermore, such a measure would create an obstacle
for any future Community plan aiming to protect workers in our sectors against noise.
Should such a position be maintained, we fear that the investigative work that the Commission
is to carry out would be seriously disrupted by the action of powerful lobbies who, instead
of presenting constructive proposals, would simply oppose any draft regulation in order
to exclude these sectors from the scope of the Directive. On this note, it is useful to
recall the common position that we previously expressed with our social partners in PEARLE
calling for specific measures, rather than a simple exclusion. Should the Directive exempt
the music and entertainment workers from its scope, this would disrupt the European Social
Dialogue and dissuade other parties from cooperating in any constructive way with the
Commission.
Consequently, the sheer exclusion of the music and entertainment sectors from the
Directive's scope of application must be scratched out of this amendment.
Proposal
We feel that a satisfactory and balanced solution would be to retain the amendment, whilst
removing the possibility to exclude the music and the entertainment sectors and adding a
phrase that could bring together economic needs and public health requirements. The
phrasing could be as follows:
"The requirements of this Directive shall apply to such activities in the music and
entertainment sectors (to live sounds and/or recorded sounds) five years after the entry
into force of this Directive.
At the latest 3 years before this date, the Commission shall present a report to the
European Parliament and the Council. This report, to be prepared in cooperation with the
two sides of industry affected, shall analyze the implications of the Directive for those
sectors. On the basis of this report, the Commission shall, if appropriate, submit a
proposal, the aim of which may be to regulate those activities by different means so as to
take into consideration the specific aspects of these sectors."
We should like to thank you in anticipation for your time and attention. We are convinced
that you will appreciate the importance of these observations for all the professionals that
we represent. Should you require any further information or explanation, please do not
hesitate to contact us.
|
Jean VINCENT
FIM General Secretary |
|
 |
|
|
Jim WILSON
UNI-MEI Director |
|
 |
|
|
Dominick LUQUER
FIA General Secretary |
|
 |
|
|